Conservation and Society

ARTICLE
Year
: 2017  |  Volume : 15  |  Issue : 3  |  Page : 322--333

Drilling through Conservation Policy: Oil Exploration in Murchison Falls Protected Area, Uganda


Catrina A MacKenzie1, Rebecca K Fuda2, Sadie Jane Ryan3, Joel Hartter4 
1 Department of Geography, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada and Department of Geography, University of Vermont, Burlington, Vermont, USA
2 Department of Environmental and Forest Biology, SUNY College of Environmental Science and Forestry, Syracuse, NY, USA
3 Department of Geography and Emerging Pathogens Institute, University of Florida, Florida, USA and Center for Global Health and Translational Science, SUNY Upstate Medical University and School of Life Sciences, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa
4 Environmental Studies Program, University of Colorado, Sustainability, Energy, and Environment Community, Boulder, Colorado, USA

Correspondence Address:
Catrina A MacKenzie
Department of Geography, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada and Department of Geography, University of Vermont, Burlington, Vermont
USA

Approximately 2.5 billion barrels of commercially-viable oil, worth $2 billion in annual revenue for 20 years, were discovered under the Ugandan portion of the Albertine Rift in 2006. The region also contains seven of Uganda's protected areas and a growing ecotourism industry. We conducted interviews and focus groups in and around Murchison Falls Protected Area, Uganda's largest, oldest, and most visited protected area, to assess the interaction of oil exploration with the three primary conservation policies employed by Uganda Wildlife Authority: protectionism, neoliberal capital accumulation, and community-based conservation. We find that oil extraction is legally permitted inside protected areas in Uganda, like many other African countries, and that the wildlife authority and oil companies are adapting to co-exist inside a protected area. Our primary argument is that neoliberal capital accumulation as a conservation policy actually makes protected areas more vulnerable to industrial exploitation because nature is commodified, allowing economic value and profitability of land uses to determine how nature is exploited. Our secondary argument is that the conditional nature of protected area access inherent within the protectionist policy permits oil extraction within Murchison Falls Protected Area. Finally, we argue that community-based conservation, as operationalized in Uganda, has no role in defending protected areas against oil industrialisation.


How to cite this article:
MacKenzie CA, Fuda RK, Ryan SJ, Hartter J. Drilling through Conservation Policy: Oil Exploration in Murchison Falls Protected Area, Uganda.Conservat Soc 2017;15:322-333


How to cite this URL:
MacKenzie CA, Fuda RK, Ryan SJ, Hartter J. Drilling through Conservation Policy: Oil Exploration in Murchison Falls Protected Area, Uganda. Conservat Soc [serial online] 2017 [cited 2019 Aug 25 ];15:322-333
Available from: http://www.conservationandsociety.org/article.asp?issn=0972-4923;year=2017;volume=15;issue=3;spage=322;epage=333;aulast=MacKenzie;type=0