Home       About us   Issues     Search     Submission Subscribe   Contact    Login 
Conservation and Society
An interdisciplinary journal exploring linkages between society, environment and development
Conservation and Society
Users Online: 3548 Home Print this page Email this page Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size

ARTICLE
Year : 2020  |  Volume : 18  |  Issue : 4  |  Page : 340-354

Sport Hunting to Save Nature? The Case of Uganda


1 Department of Forestry, Biodiversity and Tourism, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda
2 Department of Environmental Governance and Politics, Radboud University, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
3 Cultural Geography Group, Wageningen University and Research, Wageningen, The Netherlands

Correspondence Address:
Amos Ochieng
Department of Forestry, Biodiversity and Tourism, Makerere University, Kampala
Uganda
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/cs.cs_19_41

Rights and Permissions

After having banned sport hunting in 1979, Uganda reintroduced it in 2001 around Lake Mburo National Park, and in 2006 in the Kabwoya and Kaiso-Tonya Game Management Area, with the aim to reduce human-wildlife conflicts, especially poaching, by providing incentives for the local inhabitants in order to positively change residents' attitudes towards wildlife. We conducted interviews and reviewed documents to analyse and evaluate the impacts of reintroduction of sport hunting. The income generated from sport hunting was used to provide social services and implement social development projects. There was no proof of hunting income being used for conservation purposes. Although the local perceptions of the sport hunting benefits varied, the benefits did initially help to improve local residents' attitudes towards wildlife and poaching temporarily stopped—but resumed later. Hence, this study shows that the common underlying assumption of sport hunting policies and other market- and community-based approaches to conservation—that when local residents receive benefits, they will appreciate wildlife—is debatable.


[FULL TEXT] [PDF]*
Print this article     Email this article
 Next article
 Previous article
 Table of Contents

 Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
 Citation Manager
 Access Statistics
 Reader Comments
 Email Alert *
 Add to My List *
 * Requires registration (Free)
 

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed2088    
    Printed159    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded245    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal