Home       About us   Issues     Search     Submission Subscribe   Contact    Login 
Conservation and Society
An interdisciplinary journal exploring linkages between society, environment and development
Conservation and Society
Users Online: 239 Home Print this page Email this page Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size

ARTICLE
Year : 2013  |  Volume : 11  |  Issue : 3  |  Page : 264-276

Doing 'Conservation': Effects of Different Interpretations at an Ecuadorian Volunteer Tourism Project


Current Affiliation: Department of Forest Ecosystems and Society, Department of Forest Engineering, Resources and Management, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR; Past Affiliation: Environmental Sciences Program, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR, USA

Correspondence Address:
Kerry E Grimm
Current Affiliation: Department of Forest Ecosystems and Society, Department of Forest Engineering, Resources and Management, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR; Past Affiliation: Environmental Sciences Program, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR
USA
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/0972-4923.121029

Rights and Permissions

As more people volunteer in the name of 'conservation,' a careful analysis of 'conservation' and the actors' underlying ideologies becomes pressing. Volunteers work on the seemingly similar goal of 'conservation,' but differences in interpretations can have on-the-ground impacts. In this paper, I use interviews and participant interactions to: (1) analyse how volunteers, reserve managers, and volunteer coordinators at an Ecuadorian reserve articulated 'conservation' in their discourse; and (2) examine how different conservation ideologies affected interactions among actors and with the environment. Using political ecology and a modified version of ideological and cluster criticism to analyse discourse, I found actors interpreted 'conservation' differently. I identified three ideologies presented by volunteers: Type I (preservation-oriented), Type-II (mixed), and Type-III (sustainable use-oriented); managers and coordinators held similar views as each other. Different 'conservation' ideologies among actors affected the project (e.g., acceptability of sustainable logging), interactions, perceptions of locals, and general attitudes towards conservation work.


[FULL TEXT] [PDF]*
Print this article     Email this article
 Next article
 Previous article
 Table of Contents

 Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
 Citation Manager
 Access Statistics
 Reader Comments
 Email Alert *
 Add to My List *
 * Requires registration (Free)
 

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed3168    
    Printed66    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded444    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal