Home       About us   Issues     Search     Submission Subscribe   Contact    Login 
Conservation and Society
An interdisciplinary journal exploring linkages between society, environment and development
Conservation and Society
Users Online: 282 Home Print this page Email this page Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size

ARTICLE
Year : 2011  |  Volume : 9  |  Issue : 2  |  Page : 159-171

Perspectives of effective and sustainable community-based natural resource management: An application of Q methodology to forest projects


Antioch University New England, Keene, NH, USA; R. Boškovic Institute, University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia

Correspondence Address:
James S Gruber
Department of Environmental Studies, Antioch University New England, Keene, NH, USA

Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


Rights and Permissions

Community-based natural resource management (CBNRM) has been recognised as an effective governance approach for sustainably managing commons or common-pool resources. Yet there is limited empirical research on answering the critical question: What are the principles and key characteristics that are needed to ensure long-term effective and sustainable CBNRM programmes? The research described here helps answer this question. For the first phase of this research, multiple perspectives from research teams were collected and organised into a matrix of 12 organisational principles and 60 key characteristics. These were then vetted using a large published collection of World Bank CBNRM case studies. The second phase of this research included site visits and the use of Q-sort methodology to understand the perspectives of a range of constituency groups associated with three successful forestry CBNRM sites. These sites are located in the Apuseni Mountains, Romania, Randolph, New Hampshire, and Ixtlαn de Juαrez, Oaxaca, Mexico. The findings, based on conducting principle component multi-variable analysis of the sociological and organisational data, point to four unique perspectives of what is essential for effective governance of their common-pool resources. There were also a number of areas of consensus across all four sites. Some of these findings transcend cultural differences, while others are directly associated with specific local conditions and cultural characteristics.


[FULL TEXT] [PDF]*
Print this article     Email this article
 Next article
 Previous article
 Table of Contents

 Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
 Citation Manager
 Access Statistics
 Reader Comments
 Email Alert *
 Add to My List *
 * Requires registration (Free)
 

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed6927    
    Printed265    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded1114    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal