Home       About us   Issues     Search     Submission Subscribe   Contact    Login 
Conservation and Society
An interdisciplinary journal exploring linkages between society, environment and development
Conservation and Society
Users Online: 1274 Home Print this page Email this page Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size

ARTICLE
Year : 2010  |  Volume : 8  |  Issue : 2  |  Page : 103-111

Causes and Consequences of Displacement Decision-making in Banhine National Park, Mozambique


1 College of Forestry and Conservation, University of Montana, Missoula, MT, USA; and University of Central Asia, Bishkek, Kyrgyz Republic
2 College of Forestry and Conservation, University of Montana, Missoula, MT, USA

Correspondence Address:
Chad Dear
College of Forestry and Conservation, University of Montana, Missoula, MT, USA; and University of Central Asia, Bishkek, Kyrgyz Republic

Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/0972-4923.68910

Rights and Permissions

Around the world, decision-making is looming regarding the displacement of people resident in and reliant on the natural capital in protected areas. While policies such as the World Bank's safeguard policy on involuntary resettlement guides decisions about the potential displacement of people in protected areas, there are often political and other obstacles to implementation. In the case of displacement decision-making in Banhine National Park (BNP), Mozambique, district-level government officials promoted the displacement of BNP-area residents and their resettlement into villages outside the park in a manner that was inconsistent with the World Bank safeguard policy. The decision to displace park residents was influenced by communication and capacity challenges, pressures for political decentralisation, the local-level operationalisation of international poverty reduction and development agendas, and a national-level agenda to concentrate or villagise dispersed rural populations. Ideas regarding inhabited versus uninhabited protected area models only influenced how displacement and resettlement occurred and not whether it occurred. Protected area displacement debates that do not account for broader and more powerful political forces may be of little significance to real decisions regarding displacement.


[FULL TEXT] [PDF]*
Print this article     Email this article
 Next article
 Previous article
 Table of Contents

 Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
 Citation Manager
 Access Statistics
 Reader Comments
 Email Alert *
 Add to My List *
 * Requires registration (Free)
 

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed9502    
    Printed314    
    Emailed1    
    PDF Downloaded955    
    Comments [Add]    
    Cited by others 4    

Recommend this journal