Home       About us   Issues     Search     Submission Subscribe   Contact    Login 
Conservation and Society
An interdisciplinary journal exploring linkages between society, environment and development
Conservation and Society
Users Online: 14 Home Print this page Email this page Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size

ARTICLE
Year : 2005  |  Volume : 3  |  Issue : 2  |  Page : 509-532

Role of Monitoring in Institutional Performance: Forest Management in Maharashtra, India


1 SHODH: The Institute for Research and Development, 50 Puranik Layout, Bharat Nagar, Nagpur, 440 033, India.,
2 Center for the Study of Institutions, Population, and Environmental Change (CIPEC), Indiana University, 408 N. Indiana Avenue, Bloomington, IN 47408, USA., and Ashoka Trust for Research in Ecology and the Environment, 659 5th A Main, Hebbal, Bangalore 560 024, India,

Correspondence Address:
Rucha Ghate
SHODH: The Institute for Research and Development, 50 Puranik Layout, Bharat Nagar, Nagpur, 440 033, India.

Login to access the Email id


In this article we examine the role of 'monitoring', believed to be crucial for effective participatory common property management. While gov­erning a common pool resource such as forests, there may be conditions that tempt individuals to cheat and gain substantially higher benefits. This is dis­advantageous for other participants, and can adversely affect resource condi­tion. Monitoring includes ensuring rule compliance, dealing with infractions and guarding forest areas against outsider entry. Here we examine the impact of institutional structure on monitoring and, consequently, on the effective­ness of forest management. We examine the three most frequent approaches in India, namely community-initiated management, non-governmental organisa­tion (NGO) promoted forest management, and state-sponsored Joint Forest Management (JFM). Through a comparison of 3 case studies in the Gadchi­roli district of Maharashtra in central India, we conducted a detailed com­parison of forests that are situated in similar bioclimatic conditions and similar social environments. We assess community approaches to monitoring using detailed social interviews with communities and integrate this with an analysis of forest condition at the tree, sapling and seedling level using forest plot data. Our findings indicate that local enforcement has been most effective in the case where forest management was initiated by the community, with better regeneration, and negligible evidence of grazing and fire. Inefficient monitoring was apparent in the state-initiated JFM village, with uncontrolled grazing and fire, leading to heavy damage to the forest. In the third case, with NGO-promoted forest management, greater importance was given to protect­ing the resource from outsiders, while neglecting the overuse of forest prod­ucts by the community members.


[FULL TEXT] [PDF]*
Print this article     Email this article
 Next article
 Previous article
 Table of Contents

 Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
 Citation Manager
 Access Statistics
 Reader Comments
 Email Alert *
 Add to My List *
 * Requires registration (Free)
 

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed2255    
    Printed146    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded398    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal