Home       About us   Issues     Search     Submission Subscribe   Contact    Login 
Conservation and Society
An interdisciplinary journal exploring linkages between society, environment and development
Conservation and Society
Users Online: 822 Home Print this page Email this page Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size

ARTICLE
Year : 2003  |  Volume : 1  |  Issue : 2  |  Page : 209-222

Local Uses of Parks: Uncovering Patterns of Household Production from Forests of Siberut, Indonesia


1 Health, Social and Economics Research Unit, RTI International, 3040 Cornwallis Road, RTP, NC 27709-2194, USA
2 Department of Forestry, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695, USA
3 Economics and Business Analysis Division, Booze Allen and Hamilton, 8283 Greensboro Drive, McLean, VA 22102, USA
4 Nicholas School of the Environment and Earth Sciences, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708-0328, USA

Correspondence Address:
Subhrendu K Pattanayak
Health, Social and Economics Research Unit, RTI International, 3040 Cornwallis Road, RTP, NC 27709-2194
USA
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


Rights and Permissions

This study empirically investigates how tropical forests contribute to rural economies by using household survey data to understand patterns of local forest use on Siberut, Indonesia. We use household production theory to build a model of forest products collected on Siberut as a function of labour, tools, forest condition and household classes. Five forest products-rattan, sago, and wood for construction, carpentry and fuel-are combined into a composite forest product using market prices as weights. Four classes of households are identified through cluster analysis of assets, including land, livestock, productive equipment and consumer durables. The parameters of the estimated forest production functions are consistent with underlying theory and statistically significant. Labour allocated to forest product collection has the greatest overall influence. In turn, labour allocation is significantly influenced by household composition and socio-economic factors. We also find that forest quality is negatively correlated with forest product collection. All things considered, the wealthiest households collect the least amount of forest products, and the mid-wealth households invest the most labour in collection. We discuss how the estimated parameters can help us identify potential areas of concern, suggest policy levers, understand heterogeneity in local interests and predict responses to park policies.


[FULL TEXT] [PDF]*
Print this article     Email this article
 Next article
 Previous article
 Table of Contents

 Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Citation Manager
 Access Statistics
 Reader Comments
 Email Alert *
 Add to My List *
 * Requires registration (Free)
 

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed2298    
    Printed201    
    Emailed1    
    PDF Downloaded453    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal